Standardized testing is a type of testing that young
children and teens go through during their time in school. Whether that be
elementary school or high school, students face these grueling tests time in
and out. Costs along with the staggering question of “do these tests work?” are
some of the issues that both teachers and students face. As well as these
concerns, one Mississippi Elementary school was now concerned about cheating
among students. In 2014, the teachers in a Jackson, Mississippi school were
under scrutiny for allegedly allowing and assisting their students with regards
to cheating on standardized tests in classrooms. The principal of the school was
supposedly telling teachers in a meeting to help students cheat on their tests.
Three teachers, that weren’t named in fear of jeopardizing their teaching
licenses, came out and spoke about the practices that were done at this school.
Teachers described the cheating as waiting for everyone to finish a certain
amount of questions before anyone can move on and also writing answers in the
test booklet before filling in the Scantron. What does this do you may ask?
Well, having students write their answers on the test booklet first, allowed
teachers to go around and check their work before filling out the Scantron, one
teacher explained. If an answer was incorrect, the teacher would alert them to
change it. Having everyone work at the same pace would allow teachers to go
around and check the answers before anyone moved on to the next section. And what
if a student didn’t know the answer? Teachers were told to tell students to
leave it blank and after the testing session, teachers were to fill out the
missing questions on the student’s exams. So the question here is ethical or
unethical? Do we allow teachers to assist students in an effort to raise
testing scores? Or do we let students try on their own and let them put in their
best effort themselves. This issue, I believe, is unethical. If the teachers
were assisting the students and helping them cheat then why shouldn’t their
parents be allowed to come in and help them? Obviously a joke but it really seems
like an equivalent to this situation. Using teachers knowledge to help kids get
ahead is taking the easy way out and it will only go so far, so why do it? Students
will need to learn to decipher, analyze and solve problems on their own and how
can they do that when they have a constant lifeline to give them the answer? The
solution is to let them earn what they earn. Don’t alter the scores for your
own benefit or to make your school more successful. So this issue of ethos
comes into play greatly in this situation. Do the right thing, the ethical
thing, and let students score on their own to give an accurate representation
of their own ability. Students should always put their best, and their own,
foot forward.
("Breach" is the word for breaking, lol)
ReplyDeleteI think it's safe to suggest that when teachers help students with testing, there are ethical concerns. I might suggest, however, that there is a large difference between a teacher helping a star athlete pass an exam v. a teacher helping a group of high school students score higher on a standardized exam. You pose the obvious question: "do we let students try on their own and let them put in their best effort themselves?" While the answer SHOULD be about allowing students to earn their own scores, the problem is that schools are provided funding (or not) depending on students' scores. Thus, when a teacher helps a class do better on the standardized test, the teacher is helping the school maintain the level of government funding.
You suggest that students should "earn what they earn," which is noble. You also state, and I would agree, that students "will need to learn to decipher, analyze and solve problems on their own." Do standardized tests help students to gain those skills? I'm not trying to justify what these teachers did, but rather just offer a glimpse into what may be their rationale for doing so.
Good stuff here! Remember that ethics might be contextual.